Ganfyd talk:Scientific point of view

From Ganfyd

Jump to: navigation, search

I'd have thought it goes without saying that ganfyd policy is to show a scientific point of view. Perhaps it should be stated explicitly though. Does anyone else think that it's fairly obvious, or should we have some discussion before creating a page about it? Rupert 12:53, 26 January 2006 (CET)

Materialist, even. What do we need to say about it? Is this like Wikipedia's various policies that are occasionally referrred to in discussion? Midgley 13:32, 26 January 2006 (CET)
Yes, exactly like one of Wikipedia's policies. I think just stating it is all that's required. Rupert 13:38, 26 January 2006 (CET)
Having seen today's Horizon survey, I have just linked to in evolution I think we should state the obvious in a public web site. So create a page by all means...Clinical Science has been of immense benefit to humans !.... Clinical Medicine without proper science has had quite a history of bungles....I can see a page on bloodletting is needed even if this article is adequate wikipedia:Bloodletting Mlj 22:55, 26 January 2006 (CET)