Rheumatoid arthritis

From Ganfyd

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(genetic associations the thing of the moment)
Current revision (17:00, 12 December 2009) (view source)
(comparitive biologics in RA)
 
Line 52: Line 52:
*X-ray
*X-ray
===Specialist investigations===
===Specialist investigations===
-
A wide range of differential diagnosis is possible. More specialist investigations may be directed towards these, including testing for common viral or other pathogens that cause arthritis in early onset disease or more exotic cutting edge investigations such as autoantibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) which appears to be more specific to rheumatoid arthritis than rheumatoid factor<ref>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?itool=abstractplus&db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=abstractplus&list_uids=17548411  Nishimura K, Sugiyama D, Kogata Y, Tsuji G, Nakazawa T, Kawano S, Saigo K, Morinobu A, Koshiba M, Kuntz KM, Kamae I, Kumagai S. Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and rheumatoid factor for rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of internal medicine. 2007 Jun 5; 146(11):797-808.]</ref>.
+
A wide range of differential diagnosis is possible. More specialist investigations may be directed towards these, including testing for common viral or other pathogens that cause arthritis in early onset disease or more exotic cutting edge investigations such as autoantibodies to [[cyclic citrullinated peptide]] (CCP) which appears to be more specific to rheumatoid arthritis than rheumatoid factor<ref>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?itool=abstractplus&db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=abstractplus&list_uids=17548411  Nishimura K, Sugiyama D, Kogata Y, Tsuji G, Nakazawa T, Kawano S, Saigo K, Morinobu A, Koshiba M, Kuntz KM, Kamae I, Kumagai S. Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and rheumatoid factor for rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of internal medicine. 2007 Jun 5; 146(11):797-808.]</ref>.
==Treatment==
==Treatment==
Line 59: Line 59:
*[[:category:Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs|Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs]](DMARDs)
*[[:category:Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs|Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs]](DMARDs)
*[[:category:Immunosuppressive drugs|Immunosuppressive drugs]]
*[[:category:Immunosuppressive drugs|Immunosuppressive drugs]]
 +
**[[Methotrexate]] is agent of choice
 +
*[[:Category:Immunomodulatory drugs|Immunomodulatory drugs]]
 +
**[[:category:Biologics|Biologics]]. [[Adalimumab]] and [[rituximab]] have best evidence for clinical effectiveness
 +
{| class="wikitable sortable"
 +
|+Comparative biological efficacy versus placebo<ref>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?itool=abstractplus&db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=abstractplus&list_uids=19821440  Singh JA, Christensen R, Wells GA, Suarez-Almazor ME, Buchbinder R, Lopez-Olivo MA, Tanjong Ghogomu E, Tugwell P. Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online). 2009; (4):CD007848.]<small>(Epub) </small><small>([http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007848.pub2 Link to article] &ndash; subscription may be required.)</small></ref>
 +
|-----
 +
!style="background:#669966; color:#ffffff;" | Drug
 +
!style="background:#6699cc; color:#ffffff;" | % benefit (placebo)
 +
!style="background:#669966; color:#ffffff;" | Absolute benefit
 +
!style="background:#6699cc; color:#ffffff;" | % drop out (placebo)
 +
!style="background:#669966; color:#ffffff;" | Absolute drop out
 +
!style="background:#669966; color:#ffffff;" | Benefit compared to other drug
 +
|-----
 +
!style="background:#effeef;" align="left" | [[Abatacept]]
 +
|style="background:#f9f9ff;" align="center" |47% (21%)
 +
|style="background:#effeef;" align="center" |26%
 +
|style="background:#f9f9ff;" align="center" |
 +
|style="background:#effeef;" align="center" |
 +
|style="background:#f9f9ff;" align="center" |
 +
|-----
 +
!style="background:#dff9d9;" align="left" | [[Adalimumab]]
 +
|style="background:#e9f9f9;" align="center" |63% (21%)
 +
|style="background:#dff9d9;" align="center" |42%
 +
|style="background:#e9f9f9;" align="center" |8% (5%)
 +
|style="background:#dff9d9;" align="center" |3%
 +
|style="background:#e9f9f9;" align="center" |More efficacious than anakinra, RR=2.34 (1.32 to 4.13), more likely to lead to withdrawals than [[etanercept]] OR=1.89 (1.18 to 3.04)
 +
|-----
 +
!style="background:#effeef;" align="left" | [[Anakinra]]
 +
|style="background:#f9f9ff;" align="center" |27% (21%)
 +
|style="background:#effeef;" align="center" |6%
 +
|style="background:#f9f9ff;" align="center" |9% (5%)
 +
|style="background:#effeef;" align="center" |4%
 +
|style="background:#f9f9ff;" align="center" |Less efficacious than [[adalimumab]], [[etanercept]] - RR=0.44 (0.23 to 0.85) or [[rituximab]] - RR=0.45 (0.22 to 0.90) and more likely to lead to withdrawals than [[etanercept]] -OR=2.05 (1.27 to 3.29)
 +
|-----
 +
!style="background:#dff9d9;" align="left" | [[Etanercept]]
 +
|style="background:#e9f9f9;" align="center" |61% (21%)
 +
|style="background:#dff9d9;" align="center" |40%
 +
|style="background:#e9f9f9;" align="center" |
 +
|style="background:#dff9d9;" align="center" |
 +
|style="background:#e9f9f9;" align="center" |More efficacious than [[anakinra]], and less withdrawals than [[adalimumab]], [[anakinra]] or [[infliximab]] - OR=0.37 (0.19 to 0.70)
 +
|-----
 +
!style="background:#effeef;" align="left" | [[Infliximab]]
 +
|style="background:#f9f9ff;" align="center" |45% (21%)
 +
|style="background:#effeef;" align="center" |24%
 +
|style="background:#f9f9ff;" align="center" |11% (5%)
 +
|style="background:#effeef;" align="center" |6%
 +
|style="background:#f9f9ff;" align="center" |More withdrawals than [[etanercept]]
 +
|-----
 +
!style="background:#dff9d9;" align="left" | [[Rituximab]]
 +
|style="background:#e9f9f9;" align="center" |60% (9%)
 +
|style="background:#dff9d9;" align="center" |51%
 +
|style="background:#e9f9f9;" align="center" |
 +
|style="background:#dff9d9;" align="center" |
 +
|style="background:#e9f9f9;" align="center" |More efficacious than [[anakinra]]
 +
|-----
 +
|}
*[[Joint injections]]
*[[Joint injections]]

Current revision

Contents

Introduction

A chronic inflammatory condition of connective tissue, which is destructive of joints leading to deformity; but with extra-articular manifestations and, in the majority of patients, circulating IgM rheumatoid factor.

Aetiology

Aetiology is uncertain. Prevalence approximately 3%; Female:Male=3:1.

Associations

In some Europeans:

  • HLA-DRB1 - possibly by affecting the presentation of autoantigens
  • PTPN22 - possibly by modifying T-cell–receptor signal transduction
  • TRAF1-C5 - TRAF1 possibly changes signal transduction through TNF receptors, C5 - possibly amplifies complement activation[1]

In Asians:

  • PADI4 - involved in citrullination of proteins
  • FCRL3 - Fc receptor-like 3 gene

Other genetic associations:

  • STAT4 - presumably via its role in immune differentation pathways - also with SLE[2] and consistent across races[3]

Clinical

Symptoms

Insidious onset of symmetrical joint pain, particularly in the small joints of hands, feet and wrists. In advanced disease other joints may become involved but hips are often spared

Signs

  • Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint swelling gives a spindled appearance.
  • Swan neck deformity:
    • hyperextension of PIP
    • flexion of DIP

or the reverse:

  • Boutonnière deformity:
    • flexion of PIP
    • hyperextension of DIP
  • Swelling of metatarso-phalangeal (MTP) joints broadens the forefoot
  • There may be fever, general malaise and night sweats which can occur before the onset of joint symptoms.
  • Weight loss
  • Ulnar deviation of the fingers give a characteristic deformity
image:LogoKeyPointsBox.png Criteria for Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis

4 or more of:

  • morning stiffness >1 hour
  • involvement of 3 or more joints
  • involvement of hand and wrist joints
  • symmetrical arthritis
  • subcutaneous nodules
  • positive rheumatoid factor
  • typical X ray changes - erosions, periarticular osteopaenia
American College of Rheumatology, 1987

Investigations

Specialist investigations

A wide range of differential diagnosis is possible. More specialist investigations may be directed towards these, including testing for common viral or other pathogens that cause arthritis in early onset disease or more exotic cutting edge investigations such as autoantibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) which appears to be more specific to rheumatoid arthritis than rheumatoid factor[4].

Treatment

Medical

Comparative biological efficacy versus placebo[5]
Drug  % benefit (placebo) Absolute benefit  % drop out (placebo) Absolute drop out Benefit compared to other drug
Abatacept 47% (21%) 26%
Adalimumab 63% (21%) 42% 8% (5%) 3% More efficacious than anakinra, RR=2.34 (1.32 to 4.13), more likely to lead to withdrawals than etanercept OR=1.89 (1.18 to 3.04)
Anakinra 27% (21%) 6% 9% (5%) 4% Less efficacious than adalimumab, etanercept - RR=0.44 (0.23 to 0.85) or rituximab - RR=0.45 (0.22 to 0.90) and more likely to lead to withdrawals than etanercept -OR=2.05 (1.27 to 3.29)
Etanercept 61% (21%) 40% More efficacious than anakinra, and less withdrawals than adalimumab, anakinra or infliximab - OR=0.37 (0.19 to 0.70)
Infliximab 45% (21%) 24% 11% (5%) 6% More withdrawals than etanercept
Rituximab 60% (9%) 51% More efficacious than anakinra

Surgical

  • Surgical removal of local areas of diseased synovium
  • Excision of subluxed metatarsal heads
  • Arthroplasty of hip. knee, shoulder or elbow joints, or the small joints of the hands

References

  1. Plenge RM, Seielstad M, Padyukov L, Lee AT, Remmers EF, Ding B, Liew A, Khalili H, Chandrasekaran A, Davies LR, Li W, Tan AK, Bonnard C, Ong RT, Thalamuthu A, Pettersson S, Liu C, Tian C, Chen WV, Carulli JP, Beckman EM, Altshuler D, Alfredsson L, Criswell LA, Amos CI, Seldin MF, Kastner DL, Klareskog L, Gregersen PK. TRAF1-C5 as a risk locus for rheumatoid arthritis--a genomewide study. The New England journal of medicine. 2007 Sep 20; 357(12):1199-209.(Link to article – subscription may be required.)
  2. Remmers EF, Plenge RM, Lee AT, Graham RR, Hom G, Behrens TW, de Bakker PI, Le JM, Lee HS, Batliwalla F, Li W, Masters SL, Booty MG, Carulli JP, Padyukov L, Alfredsson L, Klareskog L, Chen WV, Amos CI, Criswell LA, Seldin MF, Kastner DL, Gregersen PK. STAT4 and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. The New England journal of medicine. 2007 Sep 6; 357(10):977-86.(Link to article – subscription may be required.)
  3. Lee HS, Remmers EF, Le JM, Kastner DL, Bae SC, Gregersen PK. Association of STAT4 with Rheumatoid Arthritis in the Korean population. . 2007 Jun 11.(Epub ahead of print) (Link to article – subscription may be required.)
  4. Nishimura K, Sugiyama D, Kogata Y, Tsuji G, Nakazawa T, Kawano S, Saigo K, Morinobu A, Koshiba M, Kuntz KM, Kamae I, Kumagai S. Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and rheumatoid factor for rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of internal medicine. 2007 Jun 5; 146(11):797-808.
  5. Singh JA, Christensen R, Wells GA, Suarez-Almazor ME, Buchbinder R, Lopez-Olivo MA, Tanjong Ghogomu E, Tugwell P. Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online). 2009; (4):CD007848.(Epub) (Link to article – subscription may be required.)
Personal tools